Skip to content
Criminal LawyersCriminal Lawyers in Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT · WHY THE REASONING MATTERS

Why the Court’s reasoning matters in Regular Bail

The Regular Bail judgments explain why the Supreme Court accepted, limited or rejected propositions relevant to Regular Bail Lawyers in Supreme Court of India. Trace the reasoning to identify the premise supporting a petition ground and the factual distinction or qualification that affects the relief sought.

Searching only Regular Bail

Try a judgment in this category: Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another

Regular Bail

12 entries
Why the Court reached its conclusions2024 INSC 637 · [2024] 8 SCR 955

Prem Prakash v. Union of India Through the Directorate of Enforcement — 2024 INSC 637 · [2024] 8 SCR 955

The Court explains why a laundering bail assessment required supported foundational facts. Its reasoning distinguishes statements obtained during existing PMLA custody and limits on using a coaccused's account without independent support.

Regular Bail
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973Constitution of IndiaIndian Evidence Act, 1872Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002Transfer of Property Act, 1882
Read entry
Why the Court reached its conclusions2020 INSC 101

Sujit Tiwari v. State of Gujarat and Another · 2020 INSC 101

The Court examined why the appellant’s individual role could justify release despite the large narcotics seizure. Its reasons distinguish possible knowledge of some illegality from knowledge of the drug conspiracy while preserving stringent conditions.

Regular Bail
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
Read entry
Why the Court reached its conclusions2025 INSC 247

Udhaw Singh v. Enforcement Directorate · 2025 INSC 247

The Court addressed why continued custody could not be justified when the trial had scarcely progressed. Its explanation applies constitutional protection of a timely trial while distinguishing a contrary bail decision on its own facts.

Regular Bail
Constitution of IndiaPrevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002
Read entry
Why the Court reached its conclusions2024 INSC 632 · [2024] 8 SCR 717

Kalvakuntla Kavitha v. Directorate of Enforcement · 2024 INSC 632

The Court explained why the completed investigation and remote prospect of trial completion supported release. Its reasoning also rejects a restriction of the statutory treatment for women to those described as vulnerable.

Regular Bail
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973Constitution of IndiaPrevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002
Read entry
Why the Court reached its conclusions2024 INSC 479 · [2024] 7 SCR 97

Frank Vitus v. Narcotics Control Bureau and Others · 2024 INSC 479

The Court examined why a map-location requirement and diplomatic assurance could not remain conditions of bail. Its reasons connect statutory purpose, privacy, technical effectiveness and the accused’s ability to comply with an order of release.

Bail Conditions
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973Constitution of IndiaNarcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
Read entry