Skip to content
Criminal LawyersCriminal Lawyers in Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT · WHY THE REASONING MATTERS

Illegal Arrest Lawyers in Supreme Court of India

The Illegal Arrest judgments explain why the Supreme Court accepted, limited or rejected propositions relevant to Illegal Arrest Lawyers in Supreme Court of India. Trace the reasoning to identify the premise supporting a petition ground and the factual distinction or qualification that affects the relief sought.

Searching only Illegal Arrest

Try a judgment in this category: Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar and Another

Illegal Arrest

6 entries
Why the Court reached its conclusions2023 INSC 866

Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India and Others — 2023 INSC 866

The Court explains why written arrest grounds were needed to make the personal accusation usable. Bona fide exercise of power and independent remand scrutiny remained essential despite the special PMLA framework.

Illegal Arrest
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973Constitution of IndiaPrevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002
Read entry
Why the Court reached its conclusions2024 INSC 414 · [2024] 6 SCR 666

Prabir Purkayastha v. State (NCT of Delhi) — 2024 INSC 414 · [2024] 6 SCR 666

The Court explains why personal written grounds had to be supplied in time to oppose remand effectively. The special statute and the later charge sheet did not cure the constitutional deficiency.

Illegal Arrest
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973Constitution of IndiaPrevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967
Read entry
Why the Court reached its conclusions2024 INSC 434 · [2024] 6 SCR 864

Tarsem Lal v. Directorate of Enforcement Jalandhar Zonal Office — 2024 INSC 434 · [2024] 6 SCR 864

The Court explains why appearance bonds and cancellation of attendance warrants are not bail. Further custody of named accused after PMLA cognizance required recourse to the Special Court rather than automatic arrest.

Bail Conditions
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973Constitution of IndiaPrevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002
Read entry
Why the Court reached its conclusions2022 INSC 690 · [2022] 10 SCR 351

Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another — 2022 INSC 690 · [2022] 10 SCR 351

The Court explains why liberty protection must connect arrest necessity with proportionate attendance process. Workable conditions and timely adjudication preserve that protection beyond the initial release decision.

Regular Bail
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973Constitution of IndiaNarcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002
Read entry
Why the Court reached its conclusions2022 INSC 756 · [2022] 6 SCR 382

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary and Others v. Union of India and Others — 2022 INSC 756 · [2022] 6 SCR 382

The Court explains why the PMLA framework could be upheld only with its statutory foundations and safeguards. Criminally derived proceeds, regulated powers and unresolved individual remedies retain their separate significance.

Trial
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973Constitution of IndiaIndian Evidence Act, 1872Indian Penal Code, 1860Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002
Read entry

Illegal Arrest Lawyers in Supreme Court of India

Browse source-based research concerning Illegal Arrest, with explanations of the Court’s reasoning and the qualifications governing its conclusions. For enquiries to SimranLaw lawyers and advocates in Chandigarh, use the Contact page.