Why the Court reached its conclusions2009 INSC 874 · [2009] 10 SCR 264
The Court explained why later non-payment alone could not establish dishonest inducement at the start of a transaction. It required the High Court to reassess the FIR and remanded the case instead of quashing it finally.
Quashing FIRCode of Criminal Procedure, 1973Indian Penal Code, 1860
Read entry →Why the Court reached its conclusions2014 INSC 611 · [2014] 7 SCR 677
The Court explained why compromise could matter to this commercial prosecution despite two claimants who had not settled. Its reasons distinguish inherent quashing power from statutory compounding and retain limits for serious public wrongdoing.
Quashing FIRCode of Criminal Procedure, 1973Indian Penal Code, 1860
Read entry →Why the Court reached its conclusions2003 INSC 179 · [2003] 2 SCR 1104
The Court explained why the bar on compounding did not settle the separate question of quashing a matrimonial prosecution. Its reasons addressed the wife’s position, the interests of justice and the scope of Section 482.
Quashing FIRCode of Criminal Procedure, 1973Indian Penal Code, 1860
Read entry →Why the Court reached its conclusions2018 INSC 736
The reasons concerned the missing connection between these relatives and the conduct alleged in the matrimonial prosecution. The analysis explains why omnibus assertions remained insufficient after the developed investigative record was considered.
Quashing Criminal ProceedingsCode of Criminal Procedure, 1973Indian Penal Code, 1860
Read entry →Why the Court reached its conclusions2018 INSC 1139 · [2018] 14 SCR 1138
The Court identified a material allegation which the High Court's account of the unfinished sale had overlooked. Its reasons explain why continuation of the prosecution remained distinct from a decision that the accused was guilty.
Quashing Criminal ProceedingsCode of Criminal Procedure, 1973Indian Penal Code, 1860
Read entry →Why the Court reached its conclusions2011 INSC 633 · [2011] 10 SCR 844
The decision turned upon the Court's reading of the particular marriage, inquiry findings and allegations placed before it. The reasons show why a description of serious accusations did not answer the deficiencies which the Court found in that record.
Quashing FIRCode of Criminal Procedure, 1973Indian Penal Code, 1860
Read entry →