SUPREME COURT · WHY THE REASONING MATTERS
Examine the statutory choices and factual distinctions which explain the Supreme Court’s conclusions relevant to Criminal Lawyers in Supreme Court of India. Use those reasons to connect a petition’s ground with the supporting principle while preserving the qualifications that define its reach.
Search all judgments and articles
Explore a judgment: Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab
The Court addressed why continued custody could not be justified when the trial had scarcely progressed. Its explanation applies constitutional protection of a timely trial while distinguishing a contrary bail decision on its own facts.
Regular BailRead entryThe Court explained why the completed investigation and remote prospect of trial completion supported release. Its reasoning also rejects a restriction of the statutory treatment for women to those described as vulnerable.
Regular BailRead entryThe Court examined why a map-location requirement and diplomatic assurance could not remain conditions of bail. Its reasons connect statutory purpose, privacy, technical effectiveness and the accused’s ability to comply with an order of release.
Bail ConditionsRead entry