Skip to content
Criminal LawyersCriminal Lawyers in Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT · WHY THE REASONING MATTERS

Understand why the Supreme Court decided as it did

Examine the statutory choices and factual distinctions which explain the Supreme Court’s conclusions relevant to Criminal Lawyers in Supreme Court of India. Use those reasons to connect a petition’s ground with the supporting principle while preserving the qualifications that define its reach.

Search all judgments and articles

Explore a judgment: Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab

Judgments and articles

7 entries
Why the Court reached its conclusions2024 INSC 637 · [2024] 8 SCR 955

Prem Prakash v. Union of India Through the Directorate of Enforcement — 2024 INSC 637 · [2024] 8 SCR 955

The Court explains why a laundering bail assessment required supported foundational facts. Its reasoning distinguishes statements obtained during existing PMLA custody and limits on using a coaccused's account without independent support.

Regular Bail
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973Constitution of IndiaIndian Evidence Act, 1872Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002Transfer of Property Act, 1882
Read entry