Generally speaking, domestic violence refers to behavior that one person in an intimate relationship uses to control the other. Examples of such behavior include threats, name-calling, isolation, placing someone in fear of physical harm, stalking and sexual assault. The foregoing list of abusive behaviors is far from exhaustive. Each state has unique procedural and substantive rules to protect family members from domestic abuse. New York’s substantive domestic violence law is set forth in various sections of the state’s Penal Law, Family Court Act, and Domestic Relations Law. These statutes provide several different procedural options for someone who needs to obtain judicial protection against an abusive family member. The broad and remedial purpose of the foregoing laws is to provide the maximum level of protection for victims of domestic violence. To further this goal, New York is a “mandatory arrest” jurisdiction. 5. persons who are not related by consanguinity or affinity and who are or have been in an intimate relationship regardless of whether such persons have lived together at any time.
In New York, domestic violence cases are most frequently brought in the Family Court under Article 8 of New York’s Family Court Act. Unlike criminal proceedings, Family Court Article 8 proceedings are generally intended to secure practical protections for victims (such as orders of protection directing offenders to stay away from victims), as opposed to criminal convictions. Court-ordered relief frequently includes orders requiring the offender to vacate a marital residence and cease contact with the petitioner. The Family Court may also order someone to participate in an educational program specifically tailored for perpetrators of domestic abuse. To obtain an order of protection in New York Family Court, a petitioner must establish that a family offense has occurred. Generally, both the New York Supreme Court and the Family Court have jurisdiction to issue an Order of Protection. However, only the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to issue a divorce. Thus, individuals who do not have a marital relationship must seek judicial relief in either the Family Court or Criminal Court. Occasionally, a spouse may bring an action seeking an Order of Protection in the Family Court, and then subsequently initiate divorce proceedings in the Supreme Court. In such instances, it may be appropriate to consolidate the existing actions. Section 240(3) of New York’s Domestic Relations Law (DRL) authorizes the Supreme Court to enter an order of protection in a matrimonial action.
Interpreting that law, the California Supreme Court held that the states Good Samaritan law only protects you from being sued if you render medical care at the scene of an emergency. If on the other hand you are just rendering aid or help in a non-medical way, such as pulling someone out of a burning car, you can now be sued. That doesnt mean you will be found liable. Thats for a judge or jury to decide. 1. Donations of bad food – Have you ever given old canned food to a food drive and failed to look at the dates on the cans? What if the food in those cans were beyond the expiration date and causes food poisoning? You might be held responsible in such a case, Good Samaritan Law, notwithstanding. Beer that is past its expiration date probably wont be a problem for you but if someone serves it to a minor who drinks it and gets into a car accident, the server may face a lawsuit. Sounds like the deed of a Good Samaritan.
3. Jumping into a swimming pool to save a drowning person – If, in pulling that person to the side or lifting them out of the pool you cause them injury, you can clearly be sued under this new ruling. 4. What if youve been watching too many movies and you knock a person down or jump onto them to protect them from being shot by a bank robber running away and in so doing break their neck? You may have just won yourself another lawsuit. 5. And if you swerve to avoid hitting a dog and hit another car instead? 6. If you help someone out of a burning airplane, push them out the door into the chute and they take a header onto the tarmac, guess what? Some lawyer may slap you with a lawsuit. 7. If you see someone choking on a piece of meat in a restaurant and rush to perform the Heimlich maneuver, dont bruise their ribs getting the person to cough up that piece of food.
Otherwise, you guessed it. An attorneys lawsuit may be served on you with your next meal. 8. Then there are those unfortunate EMS helicopter pilots. There has been a rash nationwide of EMS helicopters crashing as they transport accident victims from the scenes of their auto accidents to nearby hospitals. Since the pilot is not rendering medical treatment, its likely that they can be sued and can be found at fault if a judge or jury finds them responsible for some negligence in their piloting of their helicopter. 9. Is it safe to open the door for someone? Not if you open the door into their face and cause them an injury. People can still be kind to each other. They just have to be more careful now. Can a person be sued for not coming to anothers aid? Apparently not, according to the California Supreme Court decision. First, do not yank the car accident victims arm out of their socket when pulling someone from a burning car. Once you remove the auto accident victim from the burning car, do not drop them on the sidewalk.
Instead, gently place them on a warm blanket (not the wet grass where they might catch a cold). Immediately, if not sooner, start applying bandages to every part of their body, thus qualifying your actions as emergency medical care. If you can do this while gently lifting them from the burning car, even better. Request bystanders to take pictures with their cell phones of you applying bandages to the personal injury victim and acting like a doctor, even if you dont have a medical license. If by chance you are not a doctor or paramedic, quickly go online, take a crash medical course to become a paramedic, and be sure you pass the test. Then print out your license for all to see. Keep administering medical care to the vehicle accident victim until medical personnel arrive. Since youve administered medical care, even if you are not a doctor, the car or truck or motorcycle accident victim is potentially now your patient, and there are rules about abandoning patients. In the event the auto or motorcycle accident victim youve saved is delirious, you may also want to provide psychiatric counseling to them, which could conceivably also be considered medical treatment. If weather conditions are bad or it is nighttime, and an EMS helicopter arrives at the scene instead of an ambulance, in view of the rash of EMS helicopter accidents in the U.S. However, keep applying bandages throughout the walk and again, do not abandon your patient. Proceed only to the hospital in your area with the best mortality rate.
The apex court also allowed foreign lawyers to conduct international arbitrations in India while asking the government and the Bar Council of India (BCI) to frame rules for foreign lawyers’ entry into India. Foreign firms did not have an absolute right to participate in arbitration involving foreign laws, it said, adding that they can do so only under permitted rules. Only advocates enrolled with BCI are entitled to practice law in India, the Supreme Court said. The others lawyers would have to take the permission of court, authority or person before whom proceedings are pending in order to undertake legal practice. Practice of law includes litigation as well as non-litigation activities, it said, noting that, “practicing of law includes not only appearance in courts but also giving of opinion, drafting of instruments, participation in conferences involving legal discussion. The bench of justices Adarsh Kumar Goel and UU Lalit upheld Madras High Court judgment dated Feb. 21, 2012, in AK Balaji v Bar Council of India (BCI) & Ors. “The rules are needed. We want foreign lawyers to come so as to not deny the Indian advocates of the same privilege in other countries.
The hard-fought 5-3 victory in Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt was the result of a tenacious and robust trial team. It is altogether fitting that the Supreme Court’s term-end affirmation of women’s constitutional right to abortion access in Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstadt came with a very brief but valuable separate concurring opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. In less than two pages, the diminutive but fierce justice, a.k.a. Center for Reproductive Rights, was a continuation, too rarely recognized, of Justice Ginsburg’s early legacy of fighting for equality. That legal team, for the record, was led by Stephanie Toti, who ably argued the case in March before the justices, standing up impressively to intense questioning from members of the Court — much of it unfriendly. For her pre-Supreme Court work (which did not involve abortion), Justice Ginsburg has been justly celebrated and is thought of by many as the Thurgood Marshall of women’s rights. Despite sweeping vindication of abortion rights in the dry yet powerful majority opinion written by Justice Stephen Breyer, the favorable outcome was no slam-dunk. The abortion limits at issue had already spread to other states and there were sensitive decisions along the way about which terrible restrictions to challenge and at what stage. The positive trial court findings secured by the Center’s lawyers had been rejected by a lower federal appeals court, which castigated the trial judge for daring to hold a four-day trial to independently assess the evidence. There were signals going both ways about where the Court’s swing justice, Anthony Kennedy, might land when push-came-to-shove. Without his support, the case could not have been won. In all, the case is a triumph for honest judging and a freer and more just America. Something to celebrate over this long Fourth of July weekend.
Have you been exposed to asbestos in the workplace? A recent landmark ruling by the UK Supreme Court is expected to make it much easier for thousands of sufferers of asbestos-related occupational diseases, along with the families of people who died, to claim compensation. Asbestos is an extremely hazardous material. Before the dangers became apparent it was used profusely throughout buildings from the 1950s onwards. The third main disease arising from inhaling asbestos is a less well known condition called Asbestosis. Asbestosis is non-cancerous scarring of lung tissue which causes shortness of breath, a persistent cough and chest pain. These symptoms only emerge fifteen to thirty years after initial exposure to asbestos and the disease, although limiting, is often slow to progress. However, developing asbestosis does place people at higher risk of developing life-shortening conditions, including a 10% chance of developing mesothelioma and up to 50% possibility of developing lung cancer.
There is also an increased risk of developing pleural disease, a thickening of the membrane covering the lungs which leads to chest pain and difficulty breathing. Deaths from asbestosis are still relatively rare. Latest figures from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) show that the number of deaths from asbestosis in Great Britain stood at 412 in 20101, compared to 2,3472 caused by mesothelioma. Prolonged exposure to asbestos is the primary cause of asbestosis. Although prohibited now, asbestos was used in a wide range of building materials, including pipe insulation, ceiling tiles and sprayed coatings and it is still possible to find asbestos in older buildings today. For this reason it is important to be aware of what asbestos looks like, particularly if you regularly come into contact with building material. This doesn’t necessarily mean working in the construction industry; anyone who drills, hammers or works with old buildings, such as fixing phone and computer cables, should be familiar with asbestos. If you are diagnosed with asbestosis, as well as being eligible to claim certain state benefits, you may also be able to seek compensation from your previous employer. Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit (IIDB) – asbestosis is classed as an industrial disease. If you were exposed to asbestos during your employment after 4 July 1948, you may be able to claim weekly payments. The amount you can receive for an asbestosis claim depends on the severity of your condition and you will usually undergo a specialist medical assessment. Civil claim – You can also make a civil claim for compensation against your previous employer through the courts. The first step is to seek professional legal advice. There are lots of solicitors who specialise in asbestosis claims, many of whom operate on a ‘no win, no fee’ basis.
Thousands of people who were previously suffering from adverse effects of vaccine products from drug manufacturers got a relieve after a court held their meeting with vaccine lawyers to come up with the National child Vaccine Injury Act. The act sought to preempt all design defects against all manufacturers of vaccine products. It’s a meeting which took place on February 22nd at the United States of America. At the meeting, the Supreme Court made the act which simply meant that someone can in deed seek compensation to injuries or deaths that have been incurred as a result of vaccines. According to the act, people can seek to be compensated against personal death or injury which is as a result of vaccines or side their effects. When the lawyers joined their ideas, they came up with an option where two were acts dissented and where only one was abstained. The opinion put together with the dissenting opinion sparred over the text of the law, and going deeper into discussions about grammar, wording, and also word meaning across pages of the act. This went to an extent where it covered legitimate history of the National Childhood Vaccine injury act.
The court here put together greater emphasis based on the act that provided a non-fault compensation program, in order to help those that have injuries or have incurred death as a result of vaccines. Also because the act was made in order to facilitate availability of vaccines which were protect health of the public. The court then determined these goals which were an achieved by the act and those lawsuits which were reading vaccine’s design and that will undermine the purpose and the language of the law. The key to this option was because clients and the public is what the Supreme Court emphasized. This emphasized that the public in circumstances of injury by vaccines and therefore there need to have a method through which they will receive compensation. This was for compensation of the death of a family member or injuries incurred by vaccines. This act enables those who have injuries as a result of vaccines to file a claim. When that claim is filed, then a person injury is accepted or qualified as an adverse event or that it is as a result of vaccine, the person is entitled money from funds after the sale of the vaccine. 250,000 for pain, emotional distress and pain.
Divorce by Mutual Consent is the simplest and easiest way of dissolving marriage. Both Parties ie Husband and Wife have to reach to Mutual understanding and agreement regarding terms and conditions for Divorce. On the basis of settlement and agreement, petition for Mutual Consent is drafted. Under Hindu Marriages, such Petition is filed under section 13 B of the Hindu Marriage Act. Under Christian Marriages, section 10 A of the Indian Divorce Act. Under secular or civil marriages, section 28 of the Special Marriage Act. Divorce Petition will be drafted which will include terms of settlement agreed between parties. Such Mutual Consent Divorce Petition shall be filed in the Court as court procedure. Matter will come up for hearing in the Court and generally parties have to be present before the Court and their statement is recorded. After recording of statements, First Motion will be passed. Court gives six months time to parties to reconsider their decision. This is called cooling period generally. Second Motion is set up.
Aforesaid steps shall be repeated. Statement of parties will be recorded again. After such recording of statement, Court will grant pass order and judgement, decree for divorce is granted. Some states like Delhi allow statement of one party to be recorded through power of attorney. Some Courts along with power of attorney also conduct video conferencing for Mutual Consent Divorce. This process is quite useful and advisable in case party or parties living outside India. Thus, for Divorce by Mutual Consent for NRI is possible without physical presence. It saves time, energy and money. Law specifically provided six months gap or waiting period between First Motion and Second Motion. Prior to 2009, compliance of six months waiting was not mandatory. But, in 2009, Supreme Court made it mandatory and took away the power of the Family Court or the District Court to waive of period of six months. But, Supreme Court still has power to waive of the period of six months. Thus, Supreme Court is the only Court which has the power to dissolve the marriage in less than six months.
The “Machinery of Death” ground fitfully with starts and stops yesterday, finally achieving the goal is was built for: the death of an inmate on death row. 5,562 days after Judge Marc Schumacher sentenced Juan Carlos Chavez to death, the Machinery of Death executed its purpose last night in Starke, Florida. But not smoothly. It never goes smoothly. There were by our count, nine separate appeals in the State and Federal courts. At least three petitions in the last two weeks. Would they have to leave, unfulfilled, as the man who caused them so much pain, “triumphed” one more time, using the justice to system to mock them just by staying alive? Finally, about an hour later, the Supreme Court denied a stay. Chavez was strapped to a gurney, and drugs- the subject of his final appeals- started flowing into his body. How ironic that the specific type and mix of drugs used to end a death row inmate’s life have become the subject of such intense litigation throughout the nation. The issue confronting the courts: will the drugs painlessly kill the condemned? Think about this logic: the state wanted to kill Chavez for his unspeakably horrific acts. But until they got to kill him their way- painlessly- they gave him health care better than most Americans get. The Chavez case is a hard case to talk about. And it is hard to argue against the death penalty for a person who did what Chavez did. But experience has shown us that the use of one or two outlier cases to make public policy usually ends in disastrous and unintended consequences. Would it have been so bad if Chavez had just wasted his life away in his small cell, dying a little bit every day, forgotten by the world, left only to ponder his unspeakably horrible criminal acts? We ask questions we are not sure of the answers to.
Who are the best lawyers in the Supreme Court of India to work with? Who is a good Supreme Court lawyer in India? Why are there few lawyers from South India appearing before the Supreme Court of India? Who is the best criminal lawyer in the Supreme Court of India for poor people? Who are the best criminal lawyers of the Delhi Supreme Court? How many Supreme Courts are there in India? Can I sue the Supreme Court in the Supreme Court in India? Who is the best lawyer for service matter in supreme court? Why should I respect the Supreme Court of India? What is the Role and Functions of Supreme Court of India? Why does the Supreme Court of India have two websites? Which is the best case in supreme court of India? What are the importance of supreme court in India? What is the process to become a lawyer in the Supreme Court in India? Can the Supreme Court of India make laws? What is the main work of the Supreme Court? Still have a question?
The law is a complex is tight tie up of various rules and regulations, it is quite clear that an average person could not do anything when it’s a law related thing. In such cases we need a trustworthy law person who could be like our friend, has a capability to bring in justice to us. There is an old saying that one shouldn’t lie to a doctor and lawyer, so such a supreme profession must be handled by a person who is well polished himself and keep updated about the law and regulations. He has worked with several clients in all formats like federal, criminal and civil tax matters such that it is unequivocally proved he is the best when it comes to Criminal Tax Attorney. His AV peer review was rated by Martindale Hubbell, where he is recognized as both criminal and tax attorney in the Bar Register of Preeminent.
Titles with ‘superb’ rating on AVVO, his fame through United States as a tax attorney is unmatchable. He has been awarded as the ‘Most efficient lawyer of the year 2010’ by The Daily Business review’s for the area of expertise in handling and defending litigations. He has a wide biome of clients ranging from celebrities to brokerage firms. His educational qualification would impress anyone, because he holds a Master in Law (LLM) degree, Juris Doctoral Degree in law, he is licensed and certified public accountant (CPA), also he is a certified member of Florida Bar. The professionalism in David’s firm requires warm appreciation, because each client gets individual attention personally by David Garvin other than allotting juniors or associate criminal lawyers, no matter how big or small the case is. Checking his track records would convince anybody because one would find it very difficult to find a criminal tax attorney like David Garvin in the Florida bar, or may in United States itself. The list is incomplete and in all the above cases the client was not guilty in all counts. So grazing his previous history would be enough for one to take in the wow factor how efficient his tax attorney service is.
The title of this Rhode Island Divorce tip article isn’t intended to be self-promotion, although if anyone comes to my door I will consider their case. However, this tip is meant in all seriousness and should be taken seriously. The fact is, that every lawyer licensed to practice law in the State of Rhode Island can prepare a divorce and put it through the Rhode Island court system. So where’s the tip, right? Every lawyer is licensed to put divorces through the court system. The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all of us as attorneys in the general practice of law, including me. When attorney’s advertise or promote themselves in a specific area of law it is because they have chosen to do so and NOT because they are particularly good at it. That is why I tell you to get a ‘Divorce’ Lawyer. If you are going to spend money to protect your rights, then make sure that you spend it on an attorney who regularly practices divorce and family law before the Rhode Island Family Courts. Regularly does not mean once or twice a month in my estimation. Let me give you an example. I have had a case with an attorney in the past few months who clearly is NOT a divorce attorney. The attorney used the wrong summons, an ancient divorce complaint form, requested child support for a 20 year old daughter, and was seeking alimony for a woman without any disabilities with a Masters Degree in Culinary Arts. These are only four (4) of the nine (9) glaring mistakes I found on the initial divorce package that my client received. A divorce will affect your life, your finances, your retirement benefits, your relationships with your children and more. Be sure you entrust something this important to an attorney who practices family law regularly and can answer most of your questions intelligently without a bunch of double-talk.